Drawing the Knowledge Map of the International and Domestic Scientific Cooperation Network for Housing Planning in the 21st Century

Document Type : Research Article (Applied - Development)

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Ph.D Student of Geography and Urban Planning, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: Many of the world's prestigious scientific researches that have been conducted in the field of housing planning show that housing provision and related policies in developing countries, especially for low-income urban groups, have become one of the most important urban challenges and have numerous economic consequences. It has also had its negative social and political consequences. The increasing growth of published researches and articles in this field makes a comprehensive and systematic review of studies in this field necessary, transparency and justice.
Data and Method: In this regard, the aim of this article is to portray the prevailing situation in the study of the field of housing planning and policy through descriptive and comparative analysis of English articles published in the period from 2000 to 2022 in this field, including international and Iranian authors who adapt it portrays world studies and Iran. For this purpose, first, frequently used keywords related to housing planning were searched in Web of Science and Science Direct databases and retrieved as research data. The analysis of these articles was done using scientometric methods as well as micro and macro indicators of social network analysis and using VOSviewer software.
Results: In this research, while introducing authors and universities that had a relatively high degree of centrality, it was found that the most emphasis of these articles was on themes such as Poverty, Facility, Price, Income, Market, Housing Affordability, Quantity and Quality. In Iran, in addition to these 10 fields, researchers have also been widely active in other fields such as physical resilience, natural resilience, housing policy, etc.
Conclusion: In addition to helping to better understand the specialized literature of housing planning, the finding of this research help to identify the existing research gaps in Iraninan and World studies in this field and can also open the way for the future study and research paths of researches in this field.

Keywords

Main Subjects


حاتمی، مهدیه؛ نقشینه، نادر. (1394). بررسی کمی و مصورسازی همکاری‌های بین‌سازمانی در مدارک نمایه ‌شده جمهوری اسلامی ایران در پایگاه استنادی اسکوپوس: از دیدگاه روابط دانشگاه-صنعت-دولت. پژوهش‌نامه علم‌سنجی، دوفصلنامه دانشگاه شاهد، 1(1)، 92 – 69.
رمضانی، ابوذر، شاه‌مرادی، لیلا؛ آزاده، فریدون؛ شیخ‌شعاعی، فاطمه؛ اطلسی، رشا؛ نمازی، نازلی؛ لاریجانی، باقر. (1399). مصورسازی جریان دانش در شبکه‌ی همکاری‌های بین‌فردی پژوهشگاه علوم غدد و متابولیسم. مجله دیابت و متابولیسم ایران، 20(1) 82 – 71.
رمضانی، هادی؛ علیپور حافظی، مهدی؛ مومنی، عصمت. (1396). نگاشت شبکۀ همکاری علمی نهادهای پژوهشی حوزه کتابخانه‌های دیجیتالی ایران. کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی، 21(1) 98 – 55.
ضیایی، محمود. (1399). مصورسازی شبکه همکاری‌های علمی در پژوهش‌های توریسم. برنامه‌ریزی و توسعه گردشگری، 9(2)، 46 – 27.
عرفان‌منش، محمدامین؛ اعرابی، الهام؛ اصنافی، امیررضا. (1396). مطالعه زمانی شبکه همکاری‌های بین‌المللی پژوهشگران ایرانی در تولید علم. فصلنامه مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات، دوره 28، 160 – 142.
عصاره، فریده؛ احمدی، حمید؛ حیدری، غلامرضا؛ حسینی بهشتی، ملوک‌السادات. (1396). ترسیم و تحلیل شبکه مفهومی ساختار دانش حوزۀ علم‌سنجی ایران. فصلنامه مطالعات کتابداری و علم اطلاعات، شماره پیاپی 21، 20 – 1.
علی‌نژاد چمازکتی، فاطمه؛ میرحق‌جو لنگرودی، سعیده. (1397). مصورسازی شبکه همکاری علمی پژوهشگران فصلنامه مدیریت سلامت با رویکرد علم‌سنجی: 1396 1392. مدیریت سلامت، 21(74)، 50 – 35.
قنبری، ابوالفضل؛ ظاهری، محمد. (1389). ارزیابی سیاست‌های کلان مسکن در برنامه‌های قبل و بعد از انقلاب اسلامی ایران. مسکن و محیط روستا، شماره 132، 90 – 77.
محسنی، هدی‌السادات؛ آراسته، حمیدرضا؛ قلی قورچیان، نادر؛ حعفری، پریوش. (1392). تجزیه و تحلیل SWOT برنامه‌های همکاری علمی بین‌المللی در آموزش عالی ایران. فصلنامه رهبری و مدیریت آموزشی. 7(2) 129 – 107.
محمدیان، سجاد؛ اسماعیل وزیری. (1396). تحلیل و مصورسازی شبکه هم‌تألیفی دانشگاه‌های علوم پزشکی وابسته به وزارت بهداشت با استفاده از سنجه‌های تحلیل شبکه اجتماعی بر اساس داده‌های Web of Science. مجله دانشکده پیراپزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران، 11(1)، 56 – 43.
مشکینی، ابوالفضل؛ احدنژاد، محسن؛ صالحی میشانی، حیدر. (1400). بازنگری مفهومی عوامل تحقق‌پذیری مسکن قابل استطاعت در جهان جنوب. برنامه‌ریزی و آمایش فضا، 25(4)، 139 – 113.
مشکینی، ابوالفضل؛ حسنعلی‌زاده، میلاد. (1400). تحلیل تاب‌آوری شاخص‌های مسکونی در فضاهای شهری با رویکرد عدالت فضایی (نمونه‌ی مطالعه: شهر قائمشهر). جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیطی، شماره 38، 203 – 185.
Abbasi, A., Hossain, L., Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 403-412.
Acedo, F.J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., Gala, J.L. (2006). Co-authorship in management and organizational Studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (5), 957-983.
Ardanuy, J. (2012). Scientific collaboration in Library and Information Science viewed through the Web of Knowledge: the Spanish case. Scientometrics, 90(3), 877-890.
Besancenot, D., Huynh, K., Serranito, F. (2017). Co-authorship and research productivity in economics: Assessing the assortative matching hypothesis. Journal of Economic Modelling, article in press.
Brandão, M.A., Moro, M.M. (2017). The strength of co-authorship ties through different topological properties. Journal of Brazilian Computer Society, 23:5-18.
Bródka, P., Saganowski, S., Kazienko, P. (2013). GED: the method for group evolution discovery in social networks. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3 (1), 1-14.
Bucley, R., Kalarickal, J. (2005). Housing policy in developing ountries: onjectures and refutations. World Bank Res Obs, Pp. 257 – 233.
Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and Visualizing Emerging Trends, 57 (3), 359–377.
Cobo, M. J. López-Herrera, A. G. Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera. F. (2012). SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1609-1630.
Fagan, F., Katherine S, E., Dolly, J., Nathan L., Vanderford., Heidi Weiss., Justin S. Levens. (2018). Assessing Research Collaboration through Co-authorship Network Analysis. Journal of Research Administration, 49 (1): 76-99.
Gallent, N.,  Robinson, S. (2011). Local perspectives on rural housing affordability and implications for the localism agenda in England. Journal of Rural Studies. 10.
Guns, R., Xian, Y., Dilruba, L. (2011). Q-measures and betweenness centrality in a collaboration network: a case study of the field of informetrics, 133–147.
Inzelt, A., Schubert, A., Schubert, M. (2009). Incremental citation impact due to international co-authorship Hungarian higher education institutions. Scientometrics, 78(1), 37-43
Jabeen, M., Yun, L., Wang, X., Rafiq, M., Mazher, A., Tahir, M. A., Jabeen, M. (2016). A Study to analyze collaboration patterns for Asian Library and Information Science (LIS) scholars on author, institutional and country levels. Serials Review, 42(1).
Jiang, Y., Ritchie, B. W., Benckendorff, P., Jiang, Y., Ritchie, B. W., Bibliometric, P. B. (2017). Current Issues in Tourism Bibliometric visualisation: an application in tourism crisis and disaster management research. Current Issues in Tourism, 0(0), 1–33.
Kumar, S., Jan, J. M. (2013). Mapping research collaborations in the business and management field in Malaysia, 1980–2010. Scientometrics, 97(3), 491-517.
Kuzhabekova, A. (2011). Impact of Co-Authorship Strategies on Research Productivity: a Social-Network Analysis on Publication in RUSSIAN Cardiology. A Dissertation Submitted to the faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota.
Marin, V., Giraldo, J., Robledo, S., Parra, E. (2021). Analysis of dynamic networks based on the Ising model for the case of study of co‑authorship of scientific articles. Scientific Reports / www.nature.com.
Newman, M.E.J. (2004). Co-authorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. PNAS, 101 (Suppl_1), 5200–05.
Olmeda-Gomez, C., Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Antonia Ovalle-Perandones, M., Guerrero-Bote, V., de Moya Anegon, F. (2009). Visualization of scientific co-authorship in Spanish universities. Aslib Proceedings 2009; 61(1): 83-100
Otte, E., Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28 (6), 441- 453.
Pepe, A. (2010). Structure and evolution of scientific collaboration networks in a modern research collaboratory. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI 344167). Retrieved 29 July, 2017.
Qui, Q., Liu, C., Du, D. (2019). The Structure and Dynamic of Scientific Collaboration Network among Countries along the Belt and Road. sustainability, Vol 11, 5187.
Ravikumar, S., Agrahari, A., Singh, S. N. (2014). Mapping the intellectual structure of scientometrics: a co-word analysis of the journal Scientometrics (2005–2010), Scientometrics, 102 (1), 929-955.
Soderstrom, K.R. (2023). The structure and dynamics of instrument collaboration
networks
. Scientometrics, 128: 3581 – 3600.
Truex, D. (n.d.). Journal of the Association for Information Systems Assessing Scholarly Influence: Using the Hirsch Indices to Reframe the Discourse Assessing Scholarly Influence: Using the Hirsch Indices to Reframe the Discourse, 10(7), 560–594.
Yang, Y., Wu, M., Cui, L. (2012). Integration of three visualization methods based on co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 90 (2), 659-673.