Assessing the child friendly city indicators in Mashhad metropolis

Document Type : Research Article (Applied - Development)

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Urban Management, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Master of Urban Mnagement, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

3 PhD in Geography and Urban Planning, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

10.22103/JUSG.2020.2011

Abstract

Objective: Cities and urban spaces can be either positive or negative locations for children. Neighborhoods must ideally be social places for children so that they can easily state the principles of communities and cultures and exchange them with children. This research aimed to study the status quo and the effectiveness of each of CFC indicators in order to evaluate the life satisfaction in Mashhad, Iran. In this regard, we reviewed the CFC literature.
Methods: This is an applied, descriptive survey researh. CFC's theoretical principles and literature were reviewed using the documentary studies. Then, the indicators were extracted and localized using the dimensions stated in the last UNICEF Report (2007) and valid sources in this regard. In the first stage, the status was reviewed by a field visit. Data were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire in order to assess the status quo and the effectiveness of indicators from the perspective of parents with 6-12 year-old children and children in some child-based questions. The statistical population consisted of 13 Municipal Districts of Mashhad, Iran. Districts 1, 6, and 8 were selected as the sample using clustering based on the municipal income in 2014. District 1 represents rich class; District 8 shows semi-rich class; and District 6 represents poor class. Data were analyzed by SPSS. To assess the hypothesis, firstly Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test was used in order to test the normality of the data and then T. test, Tukey test and ANOVA were employed to review the current situation and the impact indicators as well as the gap analysis.
Results:The results indicated that the effects of the following indicators were not significant in the formation of CFC in Mashhad: Participation in decision-making, health, education, and culture. According to the UNICEF standards, the results of the status quo also showed that all indicators were ranked medium or medium-to-low regardless of quantitative scale using field observations. The measures were among those for developing and developed countries. In quantitative assessment, all indicators were greater than the statistical standard (number 3) except for Playground and Green Spaces
Conclusion: Promoting welfare and healthy city indicators in CFCs requires the participation of all agencies. Municipality as the coordinator between authorities and training and educational bodies can play a key role in this regard. Urban management has come to the conclusion that children are prioritized and municipality is an important part of this element. Without participation, the ultimate goal, which is the healthy society, is not fulfilled.  

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Björklid, P (2009). Child friendly cities sustainable cities? A child centered perspective and the child’s      perspective, in: Proceedings of the 19th International Association for People–Environment Studies Conference, Alexandria. September 2006. (In English)
Brown, C., de Lannoy, A., McCracken, D., Gill, T., Grant, M., Wright, H., Williams, S (2019). Special issue: child-friendly cities, Cities & Health, 3 (1), 1-7. (In English)
Cohen, D.A., Ashwood, J.S., Scott, M.M., Overton, A., Evenson, K.R., Staten, L.K (2014). Public parks and physical activity among adolescent girls, Pediatrics, 118(5), 1381-1425. (In English)
Dryskl, D (2007). Creating Better Cities with Children and Adolescents. Translated to Farsi by Tavakoli, M. & Rezvani, N. S. Tehran: Dipacheh Press. (In English)
Ebrahimi, H., Saeedi Rezvani, N., Manjili Maani, A (2011). Principles of designing children's play spaces with emphasis on the age group of 5 to 12 years: a case study of Rasht, Bagh- E Nazar Quarterly, 19, 34-58. (in persian)
Ghaffari, A., Qalenoyie, M., Emadi, K (2014). Child-friendly city; Evaluation and comparison of how to respond to the principles of child-friendly cities in the new and traditional contexts of Iran, City Identity Journal. (in persian)
Gleeson, B., Sipe, N., Rolley, K (2015). Pathways to the child friendly city, in: B. Gleeson and N. Sipe (Eds) Creating Child Friendly Cities, Reinstating Kids in the City, ch. 10. London: Routledge. (In English)
Gummesson, M (2007). Barns säkra tillgängli ghet till skolan [Children’s safe accessibility to school], Institutionen för arkitektur, Chalmers Tekniska Högskola, Göteborg. (In English)
Holt Nicholas, L (2014). Neighborhood physical activity opportunities for inner-city children and youth, Journal of Health & Place, 15, 1022-1028. (In English)
Imani, B., Yarmohammadi, K., Yarmohammadi, K (2017). Child Friendly City from the Perspective of Children (Case Study: District 1 of Ardabil), Journal of Geography and Environmental Studies, 21, 7-22. (in persian)
Johnson, W (2014). Brusels the Childlish Capital, Urban Studies, 11(2), 115- 132. (In English)
Kamelnia, H., Haghir, S., (2009). Patterns of Green Space Design in Child-Friendly City (Case Study: Bam's Child-Friendly City), Bagh-e Nazar Quarterly, 12, 77-90. (in persian)
Karbalaei Hosseini, A., Soheili, J (2014). Characteristics of a lovely city from the children's point of view: a case study of District 2 of Qazvin Municipality, Journal of Urban Studies, 9, 59-68. (in persian)
Korpela, N (2014). Handbook of environmental psychology, Robert b. Bechtel and arza churchman, john wiley & sons, inc, Children’s Environment. (In English)
Lee, J.M., Kim, Y.G (1999). Effect of partnership quality on IS outsourcing success: conceptual framework and empirical validation, Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), 29-61. (In English)
Mashhad Statistical report (2016). Mashhad Municipality Organization. (in persian)
Mitchell, H., Kearns, A., Damian C. A (2007). Nuances of neighbourhood: Children’s perceptions of the space between home and school in Auckland, New Zealand. ELSELVIOR. (In English)
Nordström, M (2010). Children’s Views on Child-friendly Environments in Different Geographical, Cultural and Social Neighbourhoods, Urban Studies, 47(3), 122- 139. (In English)
Prihantini, P., Kurniawati, W (2019). Mapping of Child Friendly Parks Availability for Supporting Child Friendly City in Semarang, The 3rd Geoplanning-International Conference on Geomatics and Planning, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 313 (2019) 012035. (In English)
Qara Biglou, M (2012). The role of environmental factors in fostering children's creativity, Bagh-e Nazar Quarterly, 20, 18-33. (in persian)
Rajabi, J., Haji Ghasemi, F (2013). Child Friendly Urban Landscape; Landscape Approach in the Environment, Manzar Journal, 25, 20-23. (in persian)
Rakhimova, N (2011). Child-Friendly Cities and Neighborhoods: An Evaluation Framework for Planners, Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC. (In English)
Riggio, E (2002). Child friendly cities: good governance in the best interests of the child, Environment and Urbanization, 14(2), 45-58. (In English)
Safavi Moghadam, M., Noghani Dokht Bahmani, M., Mazloom Khorasani, M (2015). A Study of Child-Friendly City and Children's happiness feeling in Mashhad, Journal of Social Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 12, 143-165. (in persian)
Satispi, E (2018). Policy Development of the Child-Friendly City: Case Study of South Tangerang City Regional Government, International Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, 3(2), 105- 112. (In English)
Schneider, M (2015). The Quality of Life and Social Indicators Research, Public Administration Review, 36(3), 297-284. (In English)
Spencer, C., Woolley, H (2014). Children and the city: A summary of recent environmental psychology research, Child: Care, Health and Development, 26(3), 181-198. (In English)
Taylor, A.F., Kuo, F.E., Sullivan, W.C (2014). Coping with ADD: The surprising connection to green play settings, Environment and Behavior, 1(33), 54-77. (In English)
Tsou, K.W., Hung Y. T., Chang Y. L (2005). An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities, Department of Urban Planning, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. (In English)
UNICEF (2007). Children’s Rights and Habitat –Working towards Child-Friendly Cities, New York. (In English)
Van Vilet, W., Karsten, A (2015). Child-Friendly Cities in a Globalizing World: Different Approaches and a Typology of Children’s Roles. Children, Youth and Environments, 25(2), 1-15. (In English)
Wales, V (2013). Planning for children in public places, Children’s Environments, 9(2), 76-96.
Woolcock, G. Steele, W (2008). Towards the development of an indicators framework for a child friendly       community: literature review, Urban Research Program for the NSW Commission for Children and Young People, Griffith University, March. (In English)
Yuniastuti, E., Hasibuan, H. S (2019). Green Open Space, Towards A Child-Friendly City (A Case Study in Lembah Gurame Park, Depok City, Jakarta Greater Area, Indonesia), The 4rd International Conference in Planning in the 2019 Era of Uncertainty, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 328 (2019) 01201. (In English)
http://www.irna.ir

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 04 November 2019
  • Revise Date: 18 February 2020
  • Accept Date: 15 March 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics