The Comparative analysis of quality of life in urban old and new texture (Case study: Kerman city)

Document Type : Research Article (Applied - Development)

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Shahid Bahonar University of Keman, Kerman, Iran

2 Assistant Professor in Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Shahid Bahonar University of Keman, Kerman, Iran

3 Msc Student of Geography and Urban Planning, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

Objective: The quality of life studies in Supervision Public policy and Its role is as an efficient tool in urban management and planning. In kerman city  there are clear differences between the quality of life in its tissues Due to the physical and social conditions governing these two tissues. the purpose of this research analysis of the quality of life evaluation tissues of Kerman city.
Method: The method of this research was descriptive-analytic that done information cumulation is through library studies and through the observation of the position extant Within the scope of the study and completion the questionnaire and to analyze the data has been used from SPSS statistical software and the AHP model. has been used ArcGIS software to produce maps also.
Results: The results are from the AHP model it shows that the relative weight of quality of life indexes  n the new and old tissue it has been describedThe Bahonar district in economic index 0.375, In social index 0.285, in environmental index 0.284 and physical index 0.515, has earned. Houshang Moradi Kermani district in economic index 0.385, social index 0.544, environmental 0.547, and physical index 0.333 The situation isvery nice. Khajeh Khezr to earn 0.141 ineconomic index, social 0.087, enivrontal 0.110 and physical index 0.075 earned ponts. Moshtaghiyeh district in the economic index 0.086, social index 0.087, environment 0.057 and physical index 0.075 has earned.
Conclusion: The Result in Research showed in the all index new districtst (Bahonar and Houshangh Moradi Kermani) are better off than old district. (Khajeh Khezr andMoshtaghieh).

Keywords

Main Subjects


Bllesteros, B.C., Sanchez, I.M.G., Lorenzo, J.M.P (2012). Effects of Different Modes of Local Public Services Delivery on Quality of Life in Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production, No.37, pp.68-81. (In English)
Azimi, A (2010). The urban quality of life dimensions and indicators. monthly newsletter council’s education and research, No.3. (In Persian)
Dalkey, N.C (1982). Studies in Quality of Life. Washington DC, Lexington Books. (In English)
Das, D (2008). Urban Quality of Life: A case study of Guwahati. Social Indicators Research, Vol.88, No.2, pp.297-310. (In English)
Donald, A (2001). What is quality of life? Availableat, www.jr2.ox.ac.uk. (In English)
Epley, D.R., Menon, M (2008). A Method of Assembling Cross-sectional Indicators into a Community Quality of life. Social Indicator Research, No.88, pp.281-296. (In English)
Hantrais, L (2009). International comparative Research. Now York: Plagrare. (In English)
Hatami Nejad, H., Manuchehri, A., Baharloo, A., Ebrahimpour, A (2012). City and social justice: Analytical on inequalities neighborhood case Study: Miandoab city old neighborhoods. Human Geography Research, N.88. (In Persian)
Kerman province planning and management organization (1395). Statistics. (In Persian)
Khadem Al-Husseini, A., Mansourian, H., Sattari, M.H (2010). Measuring mental quality of life in urban areas (Case Study: Shahr Nour Abad - Lorestan Province). Journal of geography and environmental studies, No.3, pp. 45-60.
King C.R, Hinds, P.S (2006). Quality of Life from Nursing and Patient Perspective. Jones and Bartlett publishers, Massachusettes. (In English)
Lee, Y.J (2008). Subjective quality of life measurement in Taipei. Building and Environment, No.43(7), pp.1205–1215. (In English)
Liu, B.C (1996). Quality of Life Indicators in US Metropolitan Areas: A Statistical Analysis. Praeger, New York. (In English)
Lotfi S. (2009). The concept of urban quality of life: definitions, dimensions and measuring it in urban planning. Journal scientific-research human geography, No.4, pp.65-80. (In Persian)
Lotfi, S., Faraji Molla-ei, A., Manuchehri, A., Azimi, A (2011). Analysis of urban quality of life using the oantropy of method and technique SAW (Case study: Miandoab urban texture). Journal of geography and land use planning, No.1, pp.69-86. (In Persian)
Mostafa, A.M (2012). Quality of Life in Value Urban Area: Kasr Eline Street in Cairo. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Scienes, No.50, pp.254-270. (In English)
Nejat S.N (2008). Quality of life and its measurement. Journal of Iran epidemiology, 4 (2), pp.57-62. (In Persian)
Orley, J., Kuyken, W (1994). The WHO QoL Group development of the world health organization. Quality of life. Assesment Internal perspective, No.12, pp.1-6. (In English)
Phillips, D (2006). Quality of Life; Concept, Policy and Practice. London: Rutledge. Http://www.worldbank.org / (Official website of the World Bank). (In English)
PourMohammadi, M.R (2016). Urban land use planning. Samt Press, 35p. (In Persian)
Privatization and Quality of Life (Case Study: Merdeka Squar Medan). Procedia Social and Behavioral Scienes, No.36, pp.466-475. (In English)
Profect, M., Gorden, P (1992). Planning for Urban Quality. London. (In English)
Rezvani, M.R, Metkaan A.A, Mansourian, H., Sattari, M.H (2010). Dvelopment and measurement indicators of urban quality of life case Study: Shahr NourAbad - Lorestan Province. urban and regional studies and research, 1 (2): 87-110. (In Persian)
TuanSeik, F (2000). Subjective assessment of urban quality of life in Singapore. Habitat International, No.24, pp.31-49. (In English)
Vankamp (2003). Irene and etal; Urban environmental quality and human well-being Toward a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts: a literature study. landscape and urban planning, No.43, pp.3-79. (In English)
-Ware, J., Gandek, B (2004). Overview of the Sf-36 Health survey and the International Quality of life Assesment (IQOLA) project. J Clinic Epidemil, 51 (11): 903-912. (In English)